Showing posts with label Cy's Blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cy's Blog. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Throwing Like a Boy

Cy Perry
Professor Shaw 
WGSS 275
12/1/2016
Throwing like a Boy 

As a young boy, my parents have always told me that they think I will one day play baseball professionally. From the early days that I first began walking, my father has continuously made it a priority that I have a ball of some sort in my hands. My father and mother were both extremely athletic, (or at least through the stories of their “glory days” one would assume they were athletic), and have always been adamant about me playing sports throughout my lifetime. Through some trial and error, (a grueling experience with soccer and swimming), I picked out three sports that I thought I would want to play the rest of my life. Baseball, football, and basketball were my entire childhood growing up. Practices, games, and more importantly, pretending to be Kobe Bryant in my drive way as I played on a seven foot basketball hoop. As most everyone knows, kids starting at a young age clearly do not have a filter when it comes to what it is that comes out of their mouths. Calling someone a sissy if they mess up or are scared, or the most common of them all, “you throw like a girl.” This tends to create a sort of habit, more common in young boys I am sure, that is not easily dropped with the aging process. Since I am now playing college baseball, a male only sport, I think it should be appropriate that I touch on the topic of what it is to “throw like a girl.

The article written by Iris Mason Young entitled, “Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology off Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality,” speaks out on what the issues are with the habit that is clearly still around. This article focuses on the issues there is with the naming of an issue with mechanics not only throwing, but other aspects of sports such as running and toughness in sports beginning at a young age. Obviously this article basically destroys what it means to “throw like a girl” and digs further into the other issues with other actions similar to that of the shaming of doing something in a feminine way. However, that is not what caught my eye in this article. There is a paragraph on page 139 of the article that made me as a male reader, really contemplate what it is our sex is doing when we say a term such as throwing like a girl. 

The last full paragraph on page 139 explains what it is that this article is going to be doing and how it is going to be shown. There is a section of this paragraph that stood out to me. When Young mentions that the reason little girls and even grown women are forced into doing things a certain way is, “… it traces in a provisional way some of
 the basic modalities of feminine body comportment, manner of moving, and
 relation in space. It brings intelligibility and significance to certain observable
 and rather ordinary ways in which women in our society typically comport
 themselves and move differently from the ways that men do.” After I read this, I began to think back on some of the other issues we had talked about previously in this class. Women’s bodies, how they do things, and the reasons why the social norms have created these specific and simple issues, like walking or throwing a ball, it all became clear why it is that women are given this crude image when regarding doing things. It is simply because societal norms have created a specific norm for women. Body norms and the ideal body that we have talked about previously, were the first thing that came to mind. Especially considering the Farrell article that talked about the fat body, I found this connection important. 

Young is saying that the reason women throw like they do and do other things the way they do, is because of issues we see regarding the woman body. The fat and uncivilized body shaming that Farrell hits on, is a main reason for the somewhat awkward way a typical woman throws. Farrell uses examples of women contorting and doing grueling things to make sure they do not gain the extra space that fits into the category that is considered fat. They all constantly asked to take up as little as space as possible. The stereotypical way a girl throws and walks is very compact compared to that of a male. The connection between the social norm of smallness and the way that women think is the correct way corresponds exactly. Women basically have no choice in the way they throw because since the day they were born, they were taught to follow the social norm that has created the issues we have ere today.


However, there have been multiple exceptions, just like there are in males as well, that do not conform to the norm. Stand outs have always been an interesting issue to look at. Like we've discussed in class as well, Little League World Series star Mo’ne Davis is undoubtedly one of these standouts. Mo’ne was a dominant force throughout the world series and to simply put it, was better than the boys (here is a link to one of her games https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhyb0KrPECc) . She simply went against everything that she was ever taught as a young girl and simply followed her dreams to become one of the best all around athletes we've seen on television in this era. She not only was a dominant pitcher, but she played arguably the most position on the field (shortstop) when she wasn't striking out her opponents. Simply put, she was a force to be reckoned with. Mo’ne is now a freshman on her high school basketball team, where she of course plays varsity. Mo’ne not only should be an example to those little girls everywhere trying to prove that women can be athletic too, but she should be a role model to any young athlete trying to become as best as they can at a game they love, boy or girl. Maybe Mo’ne could have taught some of the boys she played with how to throw like a girl.

Thursday, November 3, 2016

What's the Difference?

Cy Perry
Professor Shaw
WGSS 275
11/3/2016

Sexy/Beautiful/Fat Response 




    As I was watching television the other day, I noticed something odd occurring. I am a 20 year old, male, college athlete and I consider myself in okay shape. Not in tremendous shape, but nor do I consider myself out of shape. I was watching a show with my girlfriend, this show is called “Girl Code.” Basically what this show does is speak out to the public about things girls do and why they do it. It is basically a show to provide males with a real idea of why women do things, or at least that is how I perceived it. There was a segment in this episode we were watching that talks about fat males. Every single woman on this show is beautiful and would be considered that by any male or female who watches it. This segment basically talked about how attractive a male who is a overweight it. It threw me off a little that these women, (who all are mostly models or stars of other TV shows), are talking about men who were overweight this way. But why was I thrown off? These beautiful women were sitting here praising males who were chubby, but it is not because of their looks. It was the way that these males have always acted towards them. From their personalities, which they all could agree on that fat guys are way funnier than any other type of guy, to the simple task of talking to them. They all agreed that yeah, a man with huge muscles and washboard abs were considered “sexy”, but that chubby guys were the way to their heart. But is it true to say the other way around? Would there be a group of famous, extremely handsome males, talking about the opposing sex the same way? Do these males prefer a woman who is considered overweight? It is hard to say because there has never been a segment on that. This got me thinking and thinking pretty hard. Is this okay? Why can’t I, myself, answer this question? This isn’t fair. Here is a link to the show http://www.mtv.com/shows/girl-code/episode-guide 
     In LeBesco’s piece titled, “Sexy/Beautiful/Fat”, she speaks on this issue. She goes into detail on the “fat woman” body and tries to challenge it by presenting articles that also challenge the way we see women’s bodies. She explains that this process was not a simple one, in fact, was an extremely difficult one to say the least. She says, “I had tremendous difficulty finding much work in mainstream media…” The only articles she was actually able to find helpful were alternative media results that were also not easy to find. These were the ones who challenged mainstream media and the way that these bodies are seen. One piece she talked about stood out to me. Rosemary Bray’s article. The piece she spoke on about a black woman in a white world, who also was fat in a thin world, and a woman in a mans world. Simply reading that, and only that, did I realize that there is no way in any shape or form that my previous question can be answered politely. There is no way a group of males would be publicly speaking about their love for bigger women. This is wrong on so many levels, except for accuracy. LeBesco’s piece goes on to say that even though Bray has made this article about her experience with the pleasure of her body, she still resorts back to the issues of her eating habits and doesn’t embrace her body. She embraces the experiences, but not her body. The body is still scrutinized for being over weight. 
     Why is it that women are able to look past the body size of a male and into his heart to see that bodies are not what makes a human being, it is the person who really makes an impact, but there is in no way shape or form that a male could do the same thing? Does it have to do with the fact that we live in a patriarchal society? Perhaps, but why is it that women can still be the ones who are making these steps towards getting rid of body shaming, while most men stand still on this type of issue. As a male myself, I never would have thought of anything this way. I never would even be having this conversation. But as I have began to dig into the world that is Women’s Gender Studies, I am seeing the horrid other side of things. I am seeing and hearing these awful instances of male ignorance and it has dramatically changed the way I think.

Friday, October 7, 2016

Reaction

Cy Perry
WGSS 275
Professor Shaw 
Blog 2
9/7/2016

        Response to “Ain’t I a Woman?” 











Popular costar in the Netflix original series, “Orange is the New Black,” Laverne Cox gave a sensational speech about what it is to be a transgendered person in the United States. Cox, who’s transition from male to female character, was shown throughout the Netflix series, is one of the icons in the trans community. She has shown what the process is like, talked about her own stories of oppression and has also told her audiences that it is all accomplishable. Her speech that basically reenacted  Sojourner Truth’s speech, was the first done by a trans gendered person. The powerful speech was given at her talk about the way the trans community faces adversity and what is we as a community have to do to help the problem. Although this speech does not advertenly effect me, I was moved by it’s power. Although Cox did not completely read the speech word for word, she used some of the same ideas that Truth used and implemented it into what it is she was trying to persuade.
Kerry Washington, a top tier African American Actress, also reenacted the speech that Truth is so famously remembered for. Although Washington’s was in different context than that of Cox, Washington still had a tremendously powerful message concerning the issues with the racial bias that African American women face on a daily basis. Both of these two speeches are a must see to anyone who challenges the oppression faced by women and trans gendered people in every day circumstances.
As far as a personal reaction, I was moved by both of these talks. Two women of such prowess can simply get you on their side just simply by speaking. I am a fan of both of these individuals, (Washington in her comedic roles, and Cox in her powerful role in Orange is the New Black,) and have gained a tremendous amount of respect for both of these individuals. More reason than not, other than the fact that these two speeches were immensely effective in providing the community with more knowledge about the ideals they were speaking about, but because I have never seen these two act as the ambassadors that they are.
Many times celebrities will state their opinion about certain things that are going on with a community and will say that more people should have the same opinion as themselves. For example, the shootings that have killed many African American citizens of the United States. This was different. These speeches were carefully thought through, and these two were made into something of an icon for more than just their roles on the screen. They were made into ambassadors of the movements they are representing. This circumstance is new to me. I have never once seen a celebrity play a role in a movement like this before. Not only are they the first I have ever seen create this powerful effect from just talking, but they are also women. A good piece to see some of the communities reactions can be seen here, http://www.al.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2014/05/laverne_cox.html . It is always important to see others reactions to compare them to your own. This helps a reader gain more from a perspective they may not have had.
In the biased community that the US has come to be, it is rare to see women have a role in such important roles. That it just a statement I have come to see. That is why these two pieces were so special to me.  They are the first ones to really have an impact on me. That is why this piece was so crucial to my learning experience. That is because it felt truly genuine because I have never seen anything like it.
 

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

The Meaning of Unfair

Cy Perry
WGSS 275 
Professor Shaw 
9/13/2016
                                                                   Meaning of Unfair 








         Today’s society has more flaws than even imaginable. Different citizens upbringing create a bias towards what is right and wrong in society. Some create tension between different groups. These groups also fall into so many different categories as well. Race, religion, political views, etc. This is a practice that has been around for as long as man kind has been civilized. The works of author Elizabeth Reis in, “Impossible Hermaphrodites: Intersex in America”, further go into detail over these flaws and bias in early America and even more in recent America (1960). These bias mostly focus on the bias of society towards Hermaphrodites and the shaming this group of individuals faced and face. For the most part this reading focused on the being of a Hermaphrodite and the horrible bias and treatment they went through in the early times and even the more recent times in America.
        There was one section of the reading that really stuck with me. Well more than just one part but the aspect at hand was really something that disturbed me more than anything else in the piece. There were several times where the formation of male and female sexual organs was considered to be almost demonic. Along with the term demonic, these people were also looked at as witches. This information sickened me. There was and still is, a negative connotation linked to something a person has absolutely zero control over. Although that is the case in most cases of bias, these examples made me feel a way that I never have really felt before. I felt for those poor people. They were discriminated against for something that was not controlled and can be seen as a completely unfair act of sheer hatred.
           Although most of the piece that Reis wrote about was full of different instances where these poor people were put through terrible things, the comparison to a demonic creature has to be the most powerful, (pg 417.) Religion was much more prevalent and held much more power in the early stages of civilization then it holds today. With that being said, the church was a very powerful place in the early times. It perhaps held as much power as any form of government at the time. If the church thought something, that meant the rest of the population felt the same way. Hermaphrodites were compared to a demonic creature that had one leg, wings on its back, and had both male and female genitalia. The sickening process that which these people were put through has touched a place in my heart. I don’t think I will ever forget or at least it will never completely leave my mind what these people were put though.
        Another aspect of the piece Reis wrote that I knew little about before reading it, the genital mutilation of Intersex people. These people were basically put on display to show off their sexual organs, all the while being called “monsters.” Although monster seems to be a little bit lighter of a term then being referred to as demons, this still had a lasting effect on me. These people were put on display, whether that be pictures taken close up of their private parts, or having horrible and graphical drawings portraying what the person saw as their sexual organs. I cannot even imagine the humiliation these people must have felt while going through this process. If you would like to see the picots that I am referring to, see Reis’s piece as there are multiple pictures though out that show these gruesome acts.
       This article helped me understand so much more about the group of people. As far as other articles I found interesting about the topic, the piece that Dan Littauer wrote about Intersex Awareness Day, was also extremely full of information. This piece goes into detail about a day I had no idea existed. That is basically what Littauer talks about in this piece. That is the lack of awareness that most of the planet has regarding Hermaphrodites. There is a stat that blew my mind. Its is known that between 1.7%-4% of the worlds population Interesx (Littauer,Intersex Awareness Day calls attention to an often ignored, misunderstood community.) Although that may seem like a small percentage, that is a massive number of human beings on the planet. This piece has many informative statistics. including how some things in nature can create the Intersex defect at birth. This piece can easily be related or linked to the piece that Reis wrote in many different ways. Reis has a more heart wrenching approach by showing some of the gruesome details that the Intersex group of people were put through throughout the years, while Littauer goes through some ways that Inttersex can be better understood and what steps are being made. Both of these pieces helped me understand so much more about Intersex and the people it effects. I would recommend both to anyone looking to find a better understanding of the misunderstood group.